Porter Ranch
Challenges
 
Record ID#
I hereby submit my challenge for the
Neighborhood Council
Election held on
I affirm that I am a stakeholder in this Neighborhood
Council who voted in the election and I have
personal knowledge of the following challenge.
Name
Business Name (if applicable)
Address
Phone
Email
Reason for Challenge
Please state the facts for your challenge. (max 500 words)
Please state your desired remedy. (max 100 words)
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Determination
Status
Date
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Phone Number
Witness Statement
First Name 2
Last Name 2
Email Address 2
Phone Number 2
Witness Statement 2
First Name 3
Last Name 3
Email Address 3
Phone Number 3
Witness Statement 3
If no witness,
please check
this box
Name2
 
83   06-11-16 Yes Andrew P Krowne   11314 Wilbur Avenue, Los Angeles, California 91326 (818) 383-3673 andrew@krownecpas.com Electioneering by candidates This challenge is not complete without the following attached documents: Flyer.png, CA State Election Code Section 18370-18371.jpg and 11280Corbin.jpg

Per “Election Code of the City of LA” Section 103(a) “It is the duty of the City Clerk to superintend all elections, as provided for in Section 281(e) of the Charter and this Code, and the City Clerk may prescribe rules and regulations for the conduct of City elections in addition to those in this Code which are not in conflict with this Code and applicable Charter, State or Federal laws. “
State of California Election Codes Section 18370-18371 state explicitly that no electioneering can occur within 100ft of a Poll.  The assertion that a Pop Up Poll could have a different limit violates State Election Law. CA Section 18370 takes precedence in this case.

11280Corbin.jpg clearly shows what 100ft looks like specific to this property (red lines and labels).  The entire property is inside the 100ft limit.  Whether or not electioneering was taking place is not debatable.  The onsite EmpowerLA representative conducting the Poll confirmed to witnesses that she knew (was aware) electioneering was occurring inside the offices “in a cubical far enough away”.  This is incorrect as the entire building is “off limits”.
Therefore any dissemination of and discussion of voter lists (flyer.png) is prohibited. 
  
Per Jay’s email there were a total of 60 votes obtained at this Pop Up Poll.  Approximately 10 came from legit stakeholders who are not employed onsite.  Those votes should stand.  The remaining 50 are illegal.  
 The approx 50 votes obtained at this Poll by employees of Toll Brothers and Coldwell Banker must be nullified as they were obtained illegally.  The precedence for this is the Chatsworth Neighborhood Council vote 2 years ago where voter status was revoked and votes nullified upon review. flyer.png CA State Election Code Section 18370-18371.JPG 11280Corbin.jpg AndrewKrowneElectionChallengeDetermination062216.pdf IEA Dismissed 06-22-16 Kristina Zitkovich shopkrissy@aol.com (818) 923-8088 SERVER-W3QPCEMS727(1).pdf Nikol Lohman nikkizbaby@aol.com (310) 699-5730 Nikol-witness form2016.pdf             Andrew P Krowne
84   06-11-16 Yes Jon Markarian   11517 Baird Avenue, Porter Ranch, California 91326 (818) 554-7399 jonmarkarian@gmail.com Electioneering by candidates On information and belief, I am informed that Candidate Becky Leveque was observed by at least two eyewitnesses electioneering at the voter registration table inside of the polling room on election day for an extended period of time with estimates placing such electioneering in the neighborhood of approx 15 minutes. Given the blatant nature of the alleged violation AND passing readily visible signs AND actually entering the polling place AND prolonged period of violation at the actual voter registration tables and areas, the amount of damage caused cannot be readily ascertained therefore can and should justify disqualification of the candidate.       JonMarkarianElectionChallengeDetermination062216.pdf IEA Dismissed 06-22-16 Alex Kim hdiusa@aol.com (818) 321-0899 2016 - 06-16 - Kim - EmpowermentWitnessForm (2).pdf Kyoko Hibino kyokohibino@aol.com (818) 731-9367 2016 - 06-16 - Hibino - EmpowermentWitnessForm (2).pdf             Jon Markarian
Subdivision challenges
Created on May  2, 2016 at  7:05 PM (PDT). Owned by Paramazian, Sevak.
Sevak Paramazian
Show fields from Show fields from Show fields from a related table
Report Name *
Description
Reports and Charts Panel
Each table has a panel listing its reports and charts, organized in groups.
Please wait while your new report is saved...
Field label
Column heading override
Justification
What does auto mean?
Fields in:

Fields to Extract:
Name for the new table:
Items in the new table are called:

When you bring additional fields into a conversion, Quickbase often finds inconsistencies. For example, say you're converting your Companies column into its own table. One company, Acme Corporation, has offices in New York, Dallas and Portland. So, when you add the City column to the conversion, Quickbase finds three different locations for Acme. A single value in the column you're converting can only match one value in any additional field. Quickbase needs you to clean up the extra cities before it can create your new table. To do so, you have one of two choices:

  • If you want to create three separate Acme records (Acme-New York, Acme-Dallas and Acme-Portland) click the Conform link at the top of the column.
  • If the dissimilar entries are mistakes (say Acme only has one office in New York and the other locations are data-entry errors) go back into your table and correct the inconsistencies—in this case, changing all locations to New York. Then try the conversion again.

Read more about converting a column into a table.

We're glad you're interested in doing more with Quickbase!

Now we need to make you official before you share apps or manage your account.

Verifying your email lets you share Quickbase with others in your company.

Your work email
Your company